Wednesday , September 28 2022

We communicate with communicating messages when we are satisfied – BBC News



[ad_1]

You do this 20,000 times a day. By doing so, you are delivering a message, and your eyes are lubricating.

Words or body language affects messages that are not only for other people: when blurred, We communicate with our desire to talk more and moreAccording to a new study.

The research conducted by Japan's scientists in 2012 revealed that this activity, which we perform at 15 to 20 minutes, allows us to relax and focus our attention on visual impetus.

According to a new study by researchers in the Netherlands, Blinking is a way to curb our conversations effectively.

Magic Planck Institute for CyclingWritis in Nijmegen, Scientists Paul Holkke, They wanted to know how we would repeat thousands of times a day and how they would do this.

Man's eyes
We blinded our eyes 20,000 times a day and wrapped it up more than needed.

Scientists who created an interface to the computer, a Avatar It worked as a virtual conversation.

Anchor in the experimental experiment asked questions to many, for example, "How was your weekend?". And "¡qué interesante!" The interface is interacting with the various comments, such as the conversation.

Scientists have long maintained the blink of the avatar I might get 208 milliseconds (A thousandSecond second) or 607 milliseconds.

"Okay, got the message"

Long blinks continued to be small responses from participants, resulting in a slightly polarized vision.

However, nobody said they listened to the flicker's changes.

Scientists are more like plugging in time, indicating that the sound like "MMM" sounds like we understand a message.

Women speak
Words or body language affect not only messages we deliver to other people.

"A blink is really equal & # 39;OK, the message has been received& # 39;, Which leads to the person who speaks to mitigate their reactions, "Honkee said.

"Our work proves that there is a tremendous impact on one of the most perceptive human advances in everyday human interventions."

Scientists make clear that the results of all people are not applicable. Because the changes in Flickr are not the same for low-level people.

The study was conducted by online science daily PLOS one.


You're interested

[ad_2]
Source link