Friday , June 9 2023

Sleek & # 39; Planet One & # 39; Is it really a huge ring of the remnants of the outer Solar System?


Painting artwork of small objects inside the Kuiper Belt.
Picture: ESO / M. Kornmesser

The odd orbit of objects beyond Neptune has led scientists as Planet Oneps, a futile planet on the outer layers of the solar system. New research suggests there is no need for an orbital exception to a planet and a large ring of debris is a reliable explanation. Critics of the specified disk say that more evidence is required.

Bruce 9, also known as Planet X, also known as Trans-Neptunian Objectives (TNOs), due to the strange orbit of some Cubier belt objects. Meteorite and dynamic objects, as well as isolated clustered behavior, contain as many as 30 TNOs as of today. In order to explain this, astronomers have proposed the planet so far. The planet must have nine times more than 10 times 200 Earth Astronomical units (AU), or 18 times more than 18.6 billion miles. The gravitational influence of this mythical planet is called "shepherd", or gradually shifting, and, according to this theory, changes TNO to their observable orbits.

Planet's nine illustrations.
Picture: Caltech / R. Be hurt

The new research published this week in the astronomical journal Planet is a beautiful alternative to the 9th hypothesis. Instead of elaborating on some radical planets, the authors of the new study are Antonic Sepilli in the University of Cambridge from the University of Cambridge and Jihad Toumah of the Beirut American University. Solar System Disk rock and ice can produce similar results, such as a large outer exterior.

Seaflines and tumaves do not provide any evidence for this disc because no. Instead, a new mathematical model of theoretical possibilities of this particular structure was introduced. The new model is not totally dividing the nine heights of the planet and the emergence of an orbital in its outer layer, rather than influencing the universe combinations. An outlet scattered disc will produce similarly obscure TNO orbits.

"Planet 9 is pretty spectacular, but the planet is the same if not yet discovered," says Zeppelin. "We'd like another less dramatic, more and more natural, rather than allowing a second planet to be an unusual orbit, rather than allowing the formation of an 9th planet, not to worry about its formation and its unusual orbit, but to the gravitational effects of smaller objects beyond Neptune's orbits. Let's see what it does for us. "

This hypothesis is not the first one to carry forward the sephilium and tube. A study by an astronomer Anne-Marie Madegon in the University of California, Berkeley in 2016, suggested an outer caper belt disc, which included ice-covered planets-remnants of the rest of the solar system, and extensive tahashes. ne orbits. How to explain this imaginary disk, a mathematical model that eight planets in the Solar System may influence Tino ban.

In their new model, Planet replaced nine virtual disks and contained objects in a spacious area. The combined gravitational force of these materials, according to Sefilion, "causes some of the extreme inclinations we see in the TNOOs."

If these external fibers are present in the planets, this can lead to the number of objects outside Neptune and the traditional predictions. According to study authors, the total mass with a diameter of one tenth of the Earth is now a possibility. But, as it is explained, it's about 10 times that of Earth. That's why a big claim, more evidence needed.

"While we do not have direct monitoring evidence for the disk, we do not have the planet nine, so we're looking for other possibilities, but Seipilian says that the Kuiper Belt observations of other stars and planetary variants reveal the debris of debris." Both things are true And possibly a large disk and ninth planet. We collect more evidence to explain each new TNO and explain their behavior. "

The presence of this plastic nine-stroke surface tester is not as easy as searching with telescopes, astronomer Carlos de la Fueh Marcos from the University of Commerce's University of Madrid said.

"If such a composition seems to be missing the real telescopic facilities, the ground-or space-based," said Mark Gosmodo, who is not associated with the new study. "This theory can be difficult to verify or refuse using available or planned telescopes." He added: "The visuals found in this work are speculative, but not."

In 2016 we also talked about Colin's astronomer Konstantin Batigin, who published evidence for Planet's nine survival. Mathematics in the new study says "the first rate". Astrophysical defects.

The first is the Kuiper Belt, approximately 48 AU, or 4.5 billion miles, from the Sun, known as the "Kuiper Mountauge". Second, according to recent researchers from Bayigne, the Kuiper belt is less than 50 times the Earth, which is much less than traditional 10 geographical estimates, 10 times the Earth estimate. These two data points indicate a specified disk of semilillan and tumae. It should start from hundreds of ostronomic techniques from the sun.

"It is good that the stars like the sun are formed in clusters and that the solar system is an excuse," he told Gizmodo. "Cosmo-chemical arguments, and the presence of Oort cloud, indicate that about 100 million years after the sun was formed in a cluster of 100 billion stars, the total gravitational force of the Sun's birth orbital period, and in the Solar System's lifetime, [random] Things that pass through the stars. "

Article preview thumbnail
Our solar system is a visiting star for 70,000 years of operation

About the same time our ancestors left Africa and brought a red dwarf star in 0.8 light years …

Read more Read

According to new astronomical studies, he believed that 100 astronomers could be at the disposal of a large prototype disk.

"Can the prototype disc of the Sun end after nearly 30 astronomical units? How was the nature of the original nature of the discrete that was originally intended, and how far surveillance surveys exist?"

These questions and others, "will not be considered for study," Batigin said. Ultimately, new paper "has become an astronomically reliable explanation for the inverse structure of the solar system," he said.

No question, the importance of the paper is weak and the absence of astronomical evidence-anyone can argue for argue with Planet nine. Some research suggests that there are no orbits in the Kuiper Belt, that scientists are a victim of observation bias. In other words, squirrelly requires more reliable data that's going on there. Astronomers are continuing with nine planets, so we can see the signs of an unexpected bond of debris on the outer layers of our solar system.

In science, there is nothing wrong with looking for multiple queries.

[Astronomical Journal]
Source link