More than 2.4 million years old stone tools and bones in the bone of Azrien in Algeria have been detected by our ardent relatives to the northern territories of Africa rather than archaeologists. Ancient Hominins, living outside Eden's garden in East Africa, believe in the newly arranged suggestion.
This extraordinary discovery was discovered in 2006, the main researcher of the new study and the Spanish Research Center for National Research Center for Human Evoluni, Mohammad Zahnani, is an alumni in an attraction in north Bucharest, northwest of Algeria. These items were included in a debris that emerges from a deep gorge.
Two years later, another layer on the site of Sahnouni, found an old one too. From 2009 to 2016, his team carefully worked on a budding campaign.
Using multiple dating techniques, Sahnna and his colleagues are 1.9 million, 2.4 million years old AB-up, AB. The objects in the two layers are now the oldest handicrafts in North Africa. At the end of the 1990s, 1.8 million years old is the location of a stone called Hinchch.
About 2.4 million years ago the devices in the AB-Lw layer were 600,000 years older than those found in Ayn Hansch, 200,000 years older than the oldest weapons found in East Africa. 2.6 million years ago, the Golan, Ethiopian's aldovan equipment. Scientists believe that Africa was an area that spanned an area a million years later. But this discovery now refers to the date of widening of the continent.
To consider these dates in our viewpoint, Homo sapiens, 300,000 years ago. Hence anonymous hominists who made these devices love to modern humans around North and East Africa about 2.3 million years ago. New findings in Ain Boutique, now published in science journal, are not a device that humans used to live in, but North Africa is a place they have cultivated.
Of course, this new research turns to a rising narrative. Men are evolving across the African continent, not just in Eastern Africa, but in traditional thinking. Moreover, the interest in archeology in North Africa must be increased.
Panels still use three different technologies: Magnetostography, Electronic Spin Rhenonance (EER) dating, and a biochenological analysis of the bones of animals.
Eleanor Scriri, an archaeologist at Oxford University, said that ancient Homine sites were "incredibly difficult" to accurately record them.
"Authors have combined multiple dating methods to make an age for early invasion [AB-Lw layer] About 2.4 million years ago "Screak told Gizmodo". They did this by reconstructing the sequence of geo-magnetic reverses being safeguarded in a well-preserved globe. The researchers found this mathematical based area. Electronine resonance (ESR) minerals and fossil minerals [animals]. "
Even when assessing these methods prevents dates, some uncertainties and assumptions are included.
Jean-Jacques Hublé, researcher at the Max Planck Institute for Universal Anthropology, was unhappy with the new study and did not enjoy the dating techniques used by Sahaniani and his colleagues.
Extraordinary claims require exceptional evidence. Hulbin told Gizmodo that there might be some dialogues about the proposed era of Ain Boucher and Ain Hutch's sites. "Palaeo Magnitism is not a dating method but it helps to limit the dates adopted by other methods, subject to various interpretations."
fair enough. These are indeed exceptional claims, so independent layers of these layers and internal materials will support the conclusions of the study.
"If confirmed, discoveries suggest that hominins have invaded North Africa more than a million years ago than previously thought," Sikri said. "This date will be more elaborate than in young Africa than in young people in northern Africa."
The earliest known stone tools in the world indicate the industry. This technology has not changed anything, and Dominus has transformed evolution history.
The stone tools found in the Ain Boucher are similar to the Aldovan equipment in East Africa. The Olwoven lithics contain the bracts with removed patches from the surface, which occur on sharp edges. In addition to this tool, researchers found rocky rocky rocks, and their perfection is unclear.
"Ain Boucherit archeology technologically similar to Gone Olgaon, not our ancestors not only in Africa, but in East Africa," notes in a statement. "Evidence from Algeria has changed [our] The first view of East Africa [as] In humanity, really, Africa was in the cradle of humanity. "
The researchers are raising two conditions to explain the presence of aldavon technology in North Africa: Technology, developed by Homine in East Africa 2.6 million years ago, quickly expanded their own technology into the northern areas. Africa was able to independently identify the other groups of aldován technology.
Archaeologists have discovered maestadones, elephants, horses, rhinos, hippies, wild animals, pigs, hyenas and crocodiles. Obviously, these ancient hominins were not picky enough. More importantly, many of these animals are associated with open savanna conditions and bodies of easily accessible fresh water. It describes the landscape of the Old World Homes that resident at that time.
Analysis of the bones written by Fossae, V-shaped gauze, indicates the separation of the bone marrow and residue. Ain Bouacht is the oldest archaeologist in North Africa to use meat with the use of stone tools.
"Effective use of a sharp knife like a knife in Ein Boutique indicates that our ancestor is not just a scavenger," said Isabel Kasseses, archaeologist researcher at Ravira Virgilia University in Spain. A statement. "It is unclear at this time [is] Evidence suggests that they have succeeded successfully in the flesh for the meat and enjoyed the first of the animals' tombs, whether they were hunting or not. "
Unfortunately there were no Homeric bones on the site. Thus, researchers are responsible for the responsibilities of the devices. This has happened Homo habilisEarly human creatures at that time, or too late AstroploysThe Hossein genus is the famous Lucy Fossil.
This document refers to the importance of North Africa and the Sahara to archeologists to learn more about human society. New questions about previous decline in hominin evolution, such as the origin and propagation of alpower technology, have raised new questions.
"In reply to this question, the answer was not answered, but it shifts the narrative upwards, pointing out that alternatives to the ancestors of the East African descent are alternatives," said Gizmodo.
"3.3 million years old fossils, as writers point out Astralitis bahragasali Chad has already been found in the Saharan region. The findings of Saohnini and colleagues distorted that North Africa and the Sahara have game-changing findings.
Humans were not even a generation
In the 1980's, we lived today in Africa, a woman called "Mitochondrial Evolution." Today we are living 150,000 to 200,000 years ago.
These findings are quite similar to Scarri's own research. In a Trends in Ecology and Evolution publication published last July, the scribe and her colleagues said Homo sapiens There was a pan African African origin and our descendants did not evolve from the same tribal mouths.
"In our model, human ancestors were already scattered throughout Africa," she explained. "Different people have been linked to each other in different places at different locations, these dynamic methods of mixing and separation resulting in the emergence of the behavioral and biomorphic characteristics of contemporary men, which appear to be less than 1.8 million years old in our biodiversity."
Scarri hopes that scientists are making more effort to find regions with less in Africa – Really Hometown
"Exploring the suburbs of the Sahara and other areas in the low wind cycles of human space makes it a major source of income, which increases the incredible values from incredible Eastern and South Africans."[Science]