Friday , November 22 2019
Home / africa / State Capture report recommends criminal investigation into 'grossly negligent' Gigaba, Brown

State Capture report recommends criminal investigation into 'grossly negligent' Gigaba, Brown



As Eskom released its interim integrated results in Johannesburg on Wednesday, Parliament's Public Enterprises Committee unanimously adopted its hard-hitting state capture inquiry report. Former public enterprises ministers Malusi Gigaba and Lynne Brown were "grossly negligent in carrying out (their) responsibilities," said the report that showed how those responsible for Eskom's governance and finances had been manipulated by legislative, regulatory and ethical prescripts. The former Eskom board chairpersons, including Ben Ngubane, Zola Tsotsi and Zethembe Khoza, and one-time executives like ex-CEO Brian Molefe and the former executives, ex-CFO Anoj Singh.

The 142-page report of the 44-word title * of the parliamentary inquiry into State Capture at Eskom is a wrap of testimony presented in a series of public hearings between October 2017 and early 2018. That's just how most, if not all , Parliamentary documents are officially structured.

Where MPs come into their own is on the sections on observations, findings and their recommendations. And that's where the Parliamentary inquiry into State Capture holds back no blows.

Procurement processes at Eskom were used by private directors and management executives acted as "inconsistent with their responsibilities", and when they became aware of wrong doings, failed to investigate, act and redress.

"The private interest to benefit these private interests is to ensure that its procurement processes are equitable, transparent, fair, competitive and cost-effective … (v) arious Eskom board members were in conflict with their dealings with some of the private businesses and may have acted unlawfully together with senior management to benefit a network that sought to achieve the capture of Eskom … "

The "inordinate secrecy" at Eskom that had undermined internal governance and controls, alongside the oversight by Parliament and others. "The Committee heard evidence of multiple instances of Eskom staff, the Eskom board (executive and non-executive directors) actively interrupted various oversight and investigative processes, or used these processes to cover up malfeasance at Eskom."

And while former public enterprises minister Lynne Brown maintained all she was not to blame for misleading Parliament on Eskom's deal with the Gupta-owned Trillian as the information came from Eskom, the report did not look kindly on how she exercised the oversight of her political portfolio nor on how Malusi Gigaba, the enterprise minister between November 2010 and May 2014 did his ministerial duties.

"Minister Gigaba's overhaul of the Eskom board introduced the patterns of instability. It is not apparent that the appointed by Gigaba had been sufficiently vetted in terms of integrity, collective skills and experience to govern Eskom and execute their fiduciary responsibility, "says the report.

It goes on to say: "Minister Brown's oversight over the actions of the executive and non-executive directors was inadequate, leading to gross breaches in fiduciary duty and potentially illegal acts."

And Eskom's board failed to oversee executives and ensure good governance on a host of issues, including the advisory and consultancy contracts of over R1.6-billion with the Gupta-linked Trillian and Regiments, the McKinsey contract with the business breakfast sponsorship with the Gupta- owned New Age, and the facilitation of the Optimum coal mine acquisition by the Gupta-linked Tegeta through the pre-payment for future coal supplies.

"Eskom's board failed to maintain clear lines of responsibility and accountability. Board members were allowed to interfere in the business of management, and often usurped the roles of group executives … Key decision-making authorities, such as the Eskom executive procurement sub-committee and Eskom's internal legal support services were deliberately sidelined to introduce and act on external options to benefit certain private companies. "

McKinsey, Regiments and Trillian were "unauthorised, irregular and there is evidence to suggest that it may involve corruption". Eskom's dealings with Tegeta was also "unauthorised, irregular and / or were otherwise unlawful". As the the New Age business breakfast sponsorships.

"… (T) he was corrupt procurement processes at Eskom would not have been possible, if not for the guise of integrity and legitimacy that some erstwhile reputable entities offered certain Eskom decisions. Such entities benefited greatly from the tainted contract and enjoyed advantageous relationships with the implicated companies, "said the inquiry report. "The Committee finds that there was a corrupt relationship between the Gupta family, their associates and key state administrators, various gratifications were provided and accepted in order to influence Eskom Board members and employees to act unlawfully and to induce Eskom to enter into a number of business contracts. "

It's unequivocal, and for parliamentarians, strong language.

Not quite so direct are the findings of the who's who who's done this. The report is more legally circumspect, saying "those may have unduly influenced Eskom decisions" include the Gupta brothers, Tony, Ajay and Atul, former president Jacob Zuma's son Duduzane Zuma, Gupta business associate Salim Essa, and executives working in their companies like Nazim Howa and Ashu Chawla.

Similarly, the report names "as possibly having acted in ways that undermined good governance and the company's financial performance" are various ex-Eskom board chairpersons like Ben Ngubane, Zola Tsotsi and Zethembe Khoza, board members like Mark Pamensky and executives like ex-CEO Brian Molefe, ex-chief financial officer Anjosh Singh, ex-acting CEOs Collin Matjila, Matshela Koko and Sean Maritz.

That shows some of the limitations of parliamentary inquiries. MPs are not investigators, but their unanimous cross-line support report sets out clear investigations by law enforcement agencies.

As the report goes, it has already been submitted to the commission in May.

In addition, the report recommended that Eskom executives like Molefe, Singh, Koko, Maritz, Eskom HR Manager Anton Minnaar, Tsotsi, Ngubane, Khoza alongside former board directors Viroshini Naidoo and Pat Naidoo must be "requested to present themselves to the Zondo commission … "

There are other concrete recommendations, including the revision of Eskom pension rules in the wake of the Molefe debacle.

And there should be lifesyle audits, that the inquiry "exposed a set of executives and senior staff that appeared to have been part of a network that actively participated in irregular, corrupt and / or other unlawful contracts and processes at Eskom ".

In a reminder to government, the report recommends the speedy delivery of much talked about, but yet to surface Shareholder. It was supposed to have been published in a draft form in March 2018, according to government's July 2017 14-point "inclusive growth action plan", but has not.

The Parliament must be updated regularly on Eskom's review, the forensic and otherwise, of dodgy contracts, steps taken against those implicated, according to the report's recommendation.

And Parliament has to consider beefing up its own rules and capacity given by Gupta Brothers Tony, Ajay and Atul snubbed the inquiry's invitation to appear before it, as did Duduzane Zuma and former SAA Board chairperson and executive of the JG Zuma Foundation, Dudu Myeni. The Zondo commission must consider subpoenaing them.

The report of the parliamentary inquiry into State Capture at Eskom may have come as the Zondo commission is in full swing. But its contributions remain fundamental: The inquiry has confirmed what former public protector Thuli Madonsela outlined

in the October 2016 State of Capture report, and it has confirmed the subsequent details that emerged in #GuptaLeaks.

And while the State Capture inquiry report must still wind its way through the parliamentary procedure, including the formal adoption by the National Assembly, Wednesday's report adoption by unanimous, cross party consensus is one of those rare moments when the Parliament works.

"We all proved to be a member of Parliament, public representatives, who want the right thing to happen in this country, "said an inquiry chairperson ANC MP Zukiswa Rantho. DM

* The full title of the report is "The Public Protector's State of Capture report, and the allegations of state capture based on leaked emails and other reports on the public's ability to discharge its fiduciary duties."

Gallery

Support DAILY MAVERICK & get FREE UBER vouchers every month

An increasingly rare commodity, quality independent journalism costs money, though not nearly as much as its absence can cost global community. No country can live and prosper without truth – that's why it matters.

Every Daily Maverick article and every Scorpio exposé is proof of our dedication to this unshakeable mission. Investing in our news media is by far the most effective investment into South Africa's future.

You can support Independent and Investigative journalism by joining Maverick Insider. If you contribute R150 or more per month you will Receive R100 back in UBER vouchers. EVERY MONTH until October 2019.

So, if you want to help and do something meaningful for yourself and your country, then sign up to become a Maverick Insider. Together we can Defend Truth.



Source link